Hemingway's First Marriage is a Casualty of 'The Lost Generation'
Remembering that The Paris Wife was based on a true story,
our discussion centered around the whys and wherefores of the characters'
personalities, choices, and underlying psychology. Janice opened the discussion
by asking us why the 21-year-old Hemingway and the 29-year-old Hadley (Hem&Had)
were attracted to each other. Answers:
Cindy -
Hem might have married her for her family's money
Janice - They filled each other's needs
Patty -
Hem was handsome, and Hadley had been closed in for much of her adult life, so
naturally she couldn't resist!
I never quite got why Hem&Had called each other
"Tatie." Did I miss something? Was it just what evolved, or perhaps,
as Peggy suggested, easier to use a simple nickname than to remember anything
else when you're drunk? And what could be easier to remember than just one
nickname for two people!
Our conversation moved quickly, with Janice asking us
questions she had prepared. We had a mixture of comments about a variety of
topics. For example, as to why Hem&Had went to Paris instead of to Rome,
where Hem originally wanted to go. Seems it was because of the influence of Sherwood Anderson, who seemed to lead a number of
writers to Paris. Much of our
discussion was based on the factual information in the book and the analysis
provided by McLain's Hadley as the first-person narrator of the book. Even
though the book was a novel, it was clearly a historical novel; we could tell that the author had done
considerable research and had mostly followed factual information about the
writers and artists she chronicled. We all seemed to enjoy the book, but we
didn't need to guess too much about the characters, because it was all there.
I felt that our discussion's original contributions to our
understanding of the book, its time, and the people it involves, were our
observations based on the history of Europe after the time of the book. Thus,
we have some perspective advantages that Hadley did not have in analyzing her
and her cohort's situations. Mentions during our discussion that seem to illuminate the dynamics of
the story include that had the modern understanding of post-traumatic stress disorder
and depression been available in the 1920s, it might have helped people in the book and might have reduced some
of the drinking. Although alcoholism is not something that is easily conquered,
it does seem that some of the drinking might have been reduced by therapy and even antidepressant medication.
Also, there was some discussion about the influences of
World War I, called "the Great War" at the time in the book. Frank
started this part of the discussion by suggesting that the art of the time was
based on reactions to the war and that behavior, especially the "party while you can" attitude exemplified in the book, was also a
reaction to the horrors of war. Patty
said that at that time, successful artists were influential leaders, e.g., Sherwood
Anderson leading artists to Paris, Gertrude Stein gathering them at her
successful "Salons," and even "La Dolce Vita" in Italy, which offers another historical world
that we could enjoy reading about. Ken suggested that after the war, all of
society was in upheaval. He said that "the rules were changed" by this war that used gas and other new
devastation tactics from afar rather than the more conventional hand-to-hand
combat. After the trauma of the war, people were finding new ways to live and
making new rules. Ken gave the example of Gauguin, who indeed found a way to
avoid the upheaval of Europe by settling in Tahiti and creating his body (pun
intended) of work there.
Some of our members had read or encountered Ernest
Hemingway's autobiographical A Moveable
Feast, which seems to tell about his wives but has been edited by one of
the wives or several family members over the years or something like that. Any
of you who know the details are welcome to post them here - as a post or
comment, or on Facebook. A Moveable Feast
seems to be a tedious read. Patty finished it but didn't like it and went so
far as to say it was poorly written and that Hemingway wouldn't have published
it in its current state.
And 2 more that Jay recommended on our Facebook page:
Running With the Bulls: My Years With the Hemingways, by Valerie Hemingway