The Friends of the Georgetown Public Library’s Hill Country Authors Series events will be listed here. Next event:
PRESS RELEASE: JEFF ABBOTT, JANUARY 31, 2018, GEORGETOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY
Austin novelist, Jeff Abbott, will return to the Georgetown Public Library to speak at the Hill Country Authors Series on Wednesday, January 31st at 2 PM. Abbott’s first appearance here was in 2012; this time he’ll discuss his fourteenth novel, Blame, published July, 2017, to critical acclaim. Known as one of the best thriller writers in the business, his latest effort was described by fellow thriller author, Harlan Coben, as “the perfect blend of complex characters, plot twists galore, and great psychological suspense."
Bestsellers around the world, Jeff's novels are thrillers that center on ordinary people caught up in sudden, unexpected nightmares, often related to secrets in their past. They combine high-stakes intrigue with emotional punch.
In Blame an amnesiac accident victim has to investigate her own past in Abbott’s tense psychological thriller. Froom Kirkus Review: “The Austin, Texas, suburb of Lakehaven is shaken when two teenagers drive off a cliff; driver Jane Norton survives while high school hero David Hall is killed. Jane comes out of a coma with part of her memory lost. After a note is found at the accident scene that suggests Jane caused the accident in a suicide attempt, she becomes an outcast; as Jane pieces together her own history, she becomes convinced she wasn’t trying to kill herself, and the accident starts looking more like murder. The unconventional plot, the constant surprises, and above all the psychological depth of the characters all make this a first-rate crime novel. “
A Rice University graduate with a degree in History and English, Abbott worked as a creative director at an advertising agency for more than eleven years, as he continued to write novels. He left that job in 2005 in order to write full-time after the success of his thriller, Panic. Three of his novels have been optioned for film, and are in script development.
He is a three-time nominee for the Mystery Writers of America’s Edgar Award and a two-time nominee for the Anthony Award. Jeff’s first novel, Do Unto Others, won both the Agatha Award and the Macavity Award.
The event begins at 2 pm at the library located at 402 W. 8th Street in Georgetown; the doors open at 1:30 pm. Tickets may be purchased online (link here) beginning December 1 at the special online price of $13.00. Tickets will go on sale in the Second-Hand Prose bookstore on the second floor of the library on January 2, 2018 for $15.00, $18 at the door. Tickets are also available from the Wow!mobile, the bookmobile that services Georgetown. Contact Marcy Lowe at 512-868-8974 for more information.
A dessert and beverage from the Red Poppy Café in the library will be served.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Would Jude Have Surpassed Obscurity if He Had Married Sue?
We had some enrichment materials at the meeting. Patty brought some photos from a literary tour through England that she took some years ago; she had visited Hardy's home and places of interest to the book. Linda had read F. B. Pinion’s Thomas Hardy: His Life and Friends about Jude the Obscure that said that there were three titles to the story that Hardy thought about using. The story was published in serialized form. We don't know exactly where Jude the Obscure came in as title, but the 3 previous titles were The Simpletons, Hearts Insurgent, and The Recalcitrants. I was somewhat surprised at the idea of The Simpletons. Was Hardy referring to Sue and Jude or maybe to everybody else? Were Sue and Jude free thinkers and intellectuals, or were they stupid? It certainly was frustrating to watch them suffer because of their stubborn decision to stay together without marrying. Nora went over Thomas Hardy's biography with us, showing how the story had autobiographical aspects. Probably the most blatant was that Hardy and his first wife lived together estranged, which was somewhat unusual, and he remarried, which was also unusual.
Themes that we identified in Jude the Obscure included marriage, religion, education, social classes, treatment of women as men's possessions, and feelings. The story gave us a historical vignette of the social structure of English small (and large) town society, and that structure wasn't pretty. We saw the dichotomy between religion and doctrine and the resulting hypocrisy. All of those who spurned Jude and Sue in the name of religion were blatantly ignoring the basic tenets of religion, such as charity. Someone pointed out that in the beginning of the story, Jude was the one who took religion literally, and Sue was more interested in education, and at the end Sue became hyper-religious and Jude had become less religious; so there was almost a changing of places on the issue of religion between them. We enjoyed the character Annabelle, always exemplifying the lower classes, poor upbringing, lack of education, and self-serving conniving. Phillotson was also an interesting character; someone noted that he was unusual in his leniency toward Sue, as he could have easily taken over her life and treated her as a possession as was the custom in that place and time. Perhaps Phillotson's leniency was an alter-ego form for Hardy, whose wife remained in his home, though not communicating much with him. Perhaps he often considered setting her free but couldn't bring himself to do it.
As often happens at our meetings, we time-traveled from the England of the 1800s of the book to modern times, and we talked about the restrictions society still places on individuals, e.g., those who are born in poverty tend to stay there. We talked about American society being much more open, with fewer class distinctions than English society even today, but we also noted that people in society tend to spend most of their social time involved with people of a similar socioeconomic background and level. We also marveled about those special individuals who, against all odds, rise far from their roots in life and achieve fame and fortune and even do good works.
This book was controversial in its time. It was mentioned that a number of people sent ashes to Hardy, representing their burning of his book. I suspect they sent ashes of the day's newspapers and kept the book to read again secretly!
submitted by Claudia