The unusual
novel, Burntcoat, by Sarah Hall, inspired an unusual discussion! Some of
us had difficulty reading the book. One member said, “I gave up halfway
through. I just couldn’t keep up the momentum to finish.”
Someone said, “At the very beginning, I was about ready to abandon it after about 25%. Then I realized that as (the book) goes on, more is revealed that begins to tie it together. So, for me, the little bit of suspense that was involved with the question ‘how is this going to tie together next(?)’ was enough to keep me going. For me, it was kind of like putting together a jigsaw puzzle. OK, where is the next piece? It was hard, but then, I’m not a big fan of stream-of-consciousness writing, either. Am I glad I read it? I’m glad I struggled through it. It was very different. Would I put it on my-favorite-books-I-have-ever-read list? No. Some of the things I had questions about that I would have liked to know more about, never got addressed. For example, what did (Edith’s) art actually look like?"
Someone
commented, “There were details about studying in Japan but no details about
what she actually did with (what she learned). Does anybody know what those
things actually looked like when she was done?” To this, I said, “It was left to the imagination, probably purposely.”
Someone
said, “I didn’t get any of the art (parts).”
”One comment
was, “It started out with the stroke. That didn’t attract my imagination."
Other
comments included, “Hall can turn a phrase. (The book) had a rich vocabulary. I
found myself looking up words more than usual. It might have been partly because
of the British orientation.”
About the
physicality, someone suggested that it might have been to remind the reader
that this was the body (of Halit), as well as his mind and soul. I used the
word, “visceral” more than once in comments about the physical details described
in the book.
I said, “There
were parts that were well-written. The parts about the mother and her treatment
and how Edith coped with her mother were my favorite parts.”
One reader noted
that reviewers said, “Dazzling and completely satisfying” and “A brilliant
novel about love, art, and the fragility of life.”
About the
pandemic in the book, someone said the pieces didn’t fit together and go
anywhere.
“This was the worst pandemic,” someone opined, “way worse than the pandemic we’re in, though it wasn’t real.” Since the book was published in 2021, someone wondered whether the author was writing about an imaginary pandemic while the actual pandemic was happening. Someone else who wasn’t able to attend the meeting also mentioned this in an email. She wasn’t sure whether the pandemic in the novel was a coincidence or whether it was purposely adapted from the real one. At the discussion, there was a suggestion that maybe the author added the pandemic parts during the editing to make the book better, and maybe even longer.
Some of the
questions at the end of the book are thought-provoking. The idea about who will
tell your story after you are gone was the theme of a question and had been the
theme of a song in the musical, Hamilton.
We made a list
of stories we found in the book: Edith’s mother’s story, Edith as a child,
Edith’s experience of her dad leaving them, the cottage on the moor, a first
boyfriend, the Japanese studying (woodwork), Ali’s backstory, Halit’s
backstory, Edith’s brother who visited, the on and off friendship of Carolina
who helped Edith’s career as an artist, and the topic of grief that meandered
through the stories and perhaps was the main topic of the book. Someone suggested
motherhood was also a main theme of Burntcoat, with protagonist Edith
saying that she brought her art into existence but did not have a motherhood
relationship with it.
The discussion was slightly more disorganized than usual, but, as usual, brought out a good discussion’s worth of ideas about the book!
No comments:
Post a Comment