THE HOUSE ON THE STRAND
Daphne du Maurier (b 1907 d 1989) was an English author,
many of whose books have been adapted into films, and also her short stories
including the classic horror movie "The Birds", directed by Alfred
Hitchcock. Born in London, she moved to
Cornwall as a young woman in the late 1920s, and used the towns and landmarks
around her home to set her novels. Her first novel was published when she was
24. She later moved to a house called Kilmarth in the town of Tywardreath, a
house over-looking St. Austell Bay and used those and other place names in her
novel "The House on the Strand". Cornwall's remoteness, its beautiful
landscape, and long history all contributed to her work.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:
1. Did you enjoy the story?
2. Why do you think
Dick is so dissatisfied with his life?
3. What do you think
of Dick and Vita's marriage? Which of the 2 characters do you like more - if
either?
4. Could the author have fleshed out the character of Magnus
more?
5. The book is written at the end of the 1960s. It has
casual derogatory remarks about homosexuality, equating it with pedophilia. Do
these remarks affect the story today?
6. Dick is entranced by life in the 14th century in the
surrounding countryside. Do you feel attracted to a previous time or place?
7. The author gives no reason why both Magnus and Dick are
obliged to follow Roger as he moves about Cornwall. Do you think it's possible
Roger has an ancestral connection to both men?
8. Did you find the family relationships in the medieval
story confusing?
9. Dick says several times he will not take another
"trip" but seems to be helpless to stop. This is addiction. Why do
you think he finds the other life so fascinating, much more so than his own
life?
10. Were you satisfied with the ending?
11. The author wrote the book in the late 1960s when psychedelic drugs such as LSD were at the height of their popularity, and the drug that Magnus invented seems quite similar to what I've read about LSD. However, in the 1970s psychedelic substances were classified as "drugs of abuse with no medical value". Nowadays, emerging research for therapeutic purposes show there may be benefits for those suffering from mental health conditions. Do you think money should be spent on continuing research?
No comments:
Post a Comment